71 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
71 lines
3.9 KiB
Plaintext
|
This is a followup to "Tools and resources."
|
||
|
A few relevant anti-acknowledgements:
|
||
|
|
||
|
First, when I say I'd like to thank the entire open-source community,
|
||
|
in this I'd like to exclude cryptocurrency peddlers, black-hat hackers,
|
||
|
people who think it's okay to use AI to steal real people's art, and fascists.
|
||
|
In a practical sense, I'm ashamed to admit I probably don't owe anyone
|
||
|
any less thanks just because they fall into any of these categories,
|
||
|
but any gratitude owed I withhold from them, and specifically them,
|
||
|
as a matter of spite.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Second, if you're an open-source enthusiast
|
||
|
and believe ethical-source software is not open-source software,
|
||
|
sorry, but I disagree. I don't care if you're from the OSI,
|
||
|
or how many stars you have on GitHub. Actually, I do care,
|
||
|
because if you're from the OSI, and/or contributed to any of the projects
|
||
|
I used to develop this game, then let me just say you're awesome
|
||
|
and I'm a big fan of your work. But what I mean is that I don't respect
|
||
|
your imaginary authority to decide for everyone else what does or doesn't count
|
||
|
as open-source just because you've done so much for the cause.
|
||
|
You can't own an idea. Heh, sound familiar?
|
||
|
|
||
|
Third, and longest:
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you care about free-as-in-libre software, and object to my use
|
||
|
of the phrase "open-source" because that's not the important part,
|
||
|
or you object to my use of an ethical-source license because it's nonfree,
|
||
|
sorry, but I disagree. Even if you're from GNU or FSF, then, again,
|
||
|
let me just say I think you're great, and I'm a huge fan of your work
|
||
|
and your community's vision, but I have two things to say to you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One, you don't even think the license I'm using counts as "free" anyway,
|
||
|
and neither does some of the ethical-source community themselves,
|
||
|
so it's out of respect for both of us that I'm not calling it that.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Two, that being said, the advantage of standard copyleft over permissive
|
||
|
is that it lets you not only grant user freedoms, but protect them.
|
||
|
The advantage of anti-harm copyleft over standard copyleft, meanwhile,
|
||
|
is the exact same: it provides for the edge cases where standard copyleft
|
||
|
still fails to protect the freedoms it grants.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Patent trolling isn't the only way a powerful entity can abuse open software
|
||
|
to strip others of the freedom to use the software in kind.
|
||
|
Say you write free-as-in-libre image recognition software,
|
||
|
and it winds up used for precision missile strikes. What about the freedoms
|
||
|
of the bombing victims to use your software? They can't use it if they're dead,
|
||
|
and your software has been used to kill them. Therefore, your software
|
||
|
has been exploited to take away from others the freedom to use your software.
|
||
|
Isn't this just a differently-presented instance of the exact scenario
|
||
|
which the free software movement initially set out to prevent?
|
||
|
Aside from the abject inhumanity involved, how is it any different?
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm sure you think cases like this are important. I'm certainly not trying
|
||
|
to say you don't. But maybe you think they fall outside the purview
|
||
|
of licensing, and should be addressed solely with activism. To which I say,
|
||
|
why? Why not both? As long as you've got a severability clause, it's not like
|
||
|
trying can hurt anything.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Maybe a hammer alone isn't the right tool for a screw, but if you have a hammer
|
||
|
and a screwdriver, why not use the screwdriver, and then make extra-sure
|
||
|
with the hammer? It's stupid, and you might break whatever you're trying
|
||
|
to get the screw into, but, well, good! Evil is an unwanted machine that ought
|
||
|
to be broken. Let's mess the screw up, you and me, and get it bent and stripped
|
||
|
in there. I hope it warps the chassis. I hope it punctures the CPU.
|
||
|
Aren't you angry about the prison that big tech and its proprietary software
|
||
|
have built? Are you still as angry about it as you were in the eighties,
|
||
|
old man? Then stop holding back. Let's tear it apart. Let's attack it
|
||
|
with EVERYTHING we have. Even dumb things, like deliberately jamming screws.
|
||
|
As a funny web animation I liked when I was younger once said,
|
||
|
throw the cheese!
|